Thursday, September 10, 2009

Loading Image Resources

Here's sample code to load an image resource file, which works even if the resource file is not in the executable assembly, but in a referenced assembly.

Bitmap bmp = new Bitmap(

    System.Reflection.Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(pick_a_class)).

    GetManifestResourceStream("Dll.Path.Image.jpg"));


pick_a_class is the name of any class in the relevant assembly.

The resource name may not be obvious. Here's code to determine the exact names of the various resources:

string[] all = System.Reflection.Assembly.GetAssembly(typeof(pick_a_class)).

    GetManifestResourceNames();

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Manipulating Xml with C#

I'm pretty fond of the XDocument class. XDocument lets you have your way with XML without requiring convoluted syntax, especially when used in conjunction with lambda expressions. Here's an example to change the value of an attribute on nodes that were found through a search criterion.


XDocument xDoc = XDocument.Load(

    new StringReader(

        @"<Customers><Customer ID=""99"" Description=""Just another customer""></Customer></Customers>"));

xDoc.Descendants("Customer").ToList().

    ForEach

    (e =>

        {

            if (e.Attribute("ID").Value == "99")

            { e.Attribute("Description").Value = "Our best customer"; }

        }

    );



Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Hiding ASP.NET Configuration Files from VSS

All I wanted to do was to keep a few ASP.NET web site files from being versioned by Visual Sourcesafe.  Seemed like a reasonable request.  I'm talking about deployment specific configuration files with things like server names in them that are referenced in web.config using the configSource attribute.  This approach is necessary for real world scenarios, where, for instance, a production server would not know what to do with the name of a database which is located only on my dev box.  Unfortunately neither Visual Studio (current version 2008) nor VSS knows how to ignore any ASP.NET files.  

I wonder what does everyone else does? I've met few ASP.NET developers who actually know about the configSource attribute. And I suspect that the few that do probably struggle originally as I have with an occasional mishap and then turn to batch scripts like as I have done for many months now.

There must be a better way, I mumbled to myself this morning. So a-Googlin' I went. Through a quick search,  I've encountered several blog posts suggesting a hack on the vssscc file for the solution. Suppposedly you can add a line like "EXCLUDED_FILE0" = "filename" and reset the "NUMBER_OF_EXCLUDED_FILES" line. There's only one catch; it doesn't work.  There went 30 minutes down the drain.

After more extensive searching, I was able to find an awkward but workable solution, from a post on a slightly different topic, which is to set the machine specific files as "hidden" in Windows. Never used that feature of Windows before!  Never had a need to.

There you are. Easy, right.  Yeah, it's easy all right, once you know.  Hard if you don't know. I can't decide: Is it surprising that  productivity insights are about the hardest thing in software development to Google for, or is really not surprising at all?  After all, internet "knowledge" seems to be mostly the blind-leading-the-blind.

It took me months to buckle-down and hunt for a solution to this annoying problem. I'm really glad I finally got around to it. I certainly hope, however, that in the future my futility-o-meter becomes more sensitive and I don't wait as long when I run into productivity snags.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Sorry. We Get the Support Documentation We Deserve

We programmers love to mumble to ourselves in abject silence about how poorly a commercial framework, api, server app, etc is documented. Though such complaints might be understandable, I suspect that the lack of effective documentation is many instances at least partly a function of apathy on the part of the user base.

Recently, I ran into perhaps the vauguest and cryptic Oracle error messages of all time: "ORA-01461 can bind a LONG value only for insert into a LONG column."

Huh? LONG? LONG is a defunct data type. Hey Oracle, what I really need to know is which column? And which table? And what exactly is meant by a "LONG value?" It's just a string characters.

Eventually I figured out that the offending insert statement referred to a column that was varchar2(4000 characters). But my string only had 2020 characters. So I should be good. Right?

Turns out Oracle has a built-in global limitation of 4000 bytes, not characters, for a varchar2. See http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/datatype.htm#CNCPT01. Even if you specify 4000 characters, the 4000 byte limit overrides. Depending on the encoding a character can be and usually is greater than one byte. Characters are typically 2 bytes. So my 2020-character string actually occupies 4040 bytes. Thus, my insert was over the global limit.

But why does the error message use the term LONG? The LONG data type can be up to 2 gigabytes. Evidently, this error message dates back to yesteryear when the only way to upload a character string longer than 4000 bytes to a table was to use a LONG column. Today, you can use a bunch of different LOB data types, instead of LONG.

Here's what really burns me: Googling "ORA-01461" provided no answers. Hmmm. What's up with that, my fellow Oracle programmers? Okay, so Oracle is not connecting the error message with the likely context in which you would see error message. Yes, that sucks. But what about our responsibilities? I haven't run across anyone on the interwebs complaining about how utterly lame and useless this error message is. If we don't complain with specificity and articulation, don't expect old-line software vendors such as Oracle to give a hoot.


Thursday, May 14, 2009

Variables in Sql Developer

Ever find yourself having to remember how to to use variables in Oracle's handy tool Sql Developer? Me, I can never remember. That's why this post is here.

There are two types of variables in the Oracle world: substitution variables and bind variables. It's important to remember that you can't use substitution variables in Sql Developer, but you can use bind variables. The syntax for bind variables is the following:

variable custno number
exec : custno := 99
Select * from customer where customerId = : custno;

Now I'll remember.


Thursday, April 23, 2009

.Net Code Converters

Once in a while I find a useful code sample written in VB.Net. Today I needed some code that essentially does the work of OracleCommandBuilder.DeriveParameters, but with some modifications. I found a code sample for just such a class, posted by someone named David Browne at http://www.dotnetmonster.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/dotnet-ado-net/116/Returning-Stored-Procedure-Parameters. Unfortunately, Mr. Browne's code is in VB.Net, whereas I'm in the middle of writing an app in my preferred language, C#.

The best code converter I've found thus far is from Telerik at http://converter.telerik.com. What's key about this converter is that it gives you very helpful translation error reporting for the inevitable copy-and-paste glitches that accompany any sizeable snippet gleaned from the web, such as inappropriate link breaks.

Saturday, January 3, 2009

Edit and Continue vs. Lambda Expressions

Microsoft giveth and Microsoft taketh away. One of the amazing gifts of .Net 3.5 is lambda expressions. Once you start using them, it's hard to stop. Unfortunately, lambda expressions are not compatible with another innovation: Visual Studio's Edit and Continue (or EnC). If you try to edit code with lambda expression while debugging in VS you get the following:

"Modifying a 'method' which contains a lambda expression will prevent the debug session from continuing while Edit and Continue is enabled."

According to this post, EnC is also incompatible with anonymous methods, a limitation present since .Net 2.